GPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mastercard, Inc. has a net margin of 23.57% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 46.03%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.85% beat Mastercard, Inc.'s return on equity of 203.65%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $100.85, signalling upside risk potential of 44.54%. On the other hand Mastercard, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $662.44 which suggests that it could grow by 26.92%. Given that Global Payments, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mastercard, Inc., analysts believe Global Payments, Inc. is more attractive than Mastercard, Inc..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard, Inc. has a beta of 0.834, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.591%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Mastercard, Inc. offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 16.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard, Inc. pays out 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Mastercard, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.8B. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $473.3M is lower than Mastercard, Inc.'s net income of $4.1B. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while Mastercard, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 1.93x versus 14.41x for Mastercard, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of 23.57% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of -22.39%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.85% beat TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of -128.95%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $100.85, signalling upside risk potential of 44.54%. On the other hand TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 398.15%. Given that TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Payments, Inc., analysts believe TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. is more attractive than Global Payments, Inc..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.565, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.476%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 16.23% of its earnings as a dividend. TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Payments, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2M. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $473.3M is higher than TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s net income of -$450.3K. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 1.93x versus 2.48x for TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa, Inc. has a net margin of 23.57% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 53.23%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.85% beat Visa, Inc.'s return on equity of 53.72%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $100.85, signalling upside risk potential of 44.54%. On the other hand Visa, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $400.81 which suggests that it could grow by 25.45%. Given that Global Payments, Inc. has higher upside potential than Visa, Inc., analysts believe Global Payments, Inc. is more attractive than Visa, Inc..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa, Inc. has a beta of 0.791, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.87%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Visa, Inc. offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 16.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa, Inc. pays out 23.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Visa, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.9B. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $473.3M is lower than Visa, Inc.'s net income of $5.8B. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while Visa, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 1.93x versus 15.07x for Visa, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Western Union Co. has a net margin of 23.57% compared to Global Payments, Inc.'s net margin of 13.55%. Global Payments, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.85% beat The Western Union Co.'s return on equity of 88.2%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a consensus price target of $100.85, signalling upside risk potential of 44.54%. On the other hand The Western Union Co. has an analysts' consensus of $9.69 which suggests that it could grow by 2.67%. Given that Global Payments, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Western Union Co., analysts believe Global Payments, Inc. is more attractive than The Western Union Co..

Global Payments, Inc. has a beta of 0.761, which suggesting that the stock is 23.884% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Western Union Co. has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.022%.

Global Payments, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. The Western Union Co. offers a yield of 9.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Global Payments, Inc. pays 16.23% of its earnings as a dividend. The Western Union Co. pays out 34.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Global Payments, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than The Western Union Co. quarterly revenues of $1B. Global Payments, Inc.'s net income of $473.3M is higher than The Western Union Co.'s net income of $139.6M. Notably, Global Payments, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.79x while The Western Union Co.'s PE ratio is 4.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Payments, Inc. is 1.93x versus 0.77x for The Western Union Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.